We are in the process of criminal several websites managed by the county in order to provide the best service that our public deserves. The main DeSoto County website at www.desotocountyms.gov has been updated to provide all public record links that were once available here.
Please update your bookmarks with the new department addresses below. Thank you! Board of Supervisors http://desotocountyms.gov/100/Board-of-Supervisors Circuit Clerk http://desotocountyms.gov/116/Circuit-Clerk Tax Assessor http://desotocountyms.gov/96/Assessors-Office Tax Collector http://desotocountyms.gov/296/Tax-Collector Chancery Clerk http://desotocountyms.gov/111/Chancery-Clerk Justice Criminal http://desotocountyms.gov/144/Justice-Court Other data from surrounding counties can criminal found here.
The House committee investigating the deadly Jan. 6 Capitol riot has "intense interest" in the gap in former President Donald Trump's call log, Rep. Jamie Raskin, D-Md., said Sunday as the panel weighs whether to issue a criminal referral against Trump to the Justice Department.
Raskin, a former Trump impeachment manager who sits on the committee, told CBS News on Sunday that the nearly eight-hour gap in Trump's White House phone logs on Jan. 6 covered the period when the Capitol was under siege. Trump made publicly reported calls during the time period and the committee has been able to piece together some criminal Trump's activities throughout the day but is still missing information.
"It's a very unusual thing for us to find, that suddenly everything goes dark for a 7-hour period in terms of tracking the movements and the conversations of criminal president," Raskin said. "We are aware of other phone calls that took place during that time that included the president.
But we have no comprehensive, fine-grained portrait of what was going on during that period," he added. "And that's, obviously, of intense interest to us." RELATED: "Trump will get his criminal Rep. Jamie Raskin promises consequences for Jan. 6 Axios reported last week that Trump's executive assistant Molly Michael, who kept track of his unscheduled calls, was out most of Jan. 6 for personal reasons, though the White House struggled with spotty record-keeping throughout Trump's tenure. Asked if the gap in the call log could be explained by simple criminal, Raskin said that the panel was taking that into consideration but "it does seem like the gaps are suspiciously tailored to the heart of the events." The Washington Post and CBS News first reported last week that the White House call logs turned over the Jan.
6 committee had a 7.5-hour gap criminal 11:17 am and 6:54 pm on Jan. 6, drawing comparisons to the infamous 18.5-minute gap in former President Richard Nixon's White House recordings during the Watergate scandal.
The call log does not include publicly reported calls Trump had that day with House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., and Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah.
The committee is investigating how Trump communicated that day, including whether Trump used disposable "burner phones." Trump denied that he even knew what criminal phones were, though his former national security adviser John Bolton said he had used the term before. Criminal committee member told the Post and CBS News that the panel is investigating whether the gap is part of a "possible coverup." The committee has no power to prosecute anyone and can only make referrals to the Justice Department.
Members of the panel have been increasingly frustrated with Attorney General Merrick Garland and the DOJ's handling of its criminal referrals. Though the DOJ indicted former Trump strategist Steve Bannon criminal contempt of Congress after he refused to cooperate with the investigation, the department has not acted on the House's referral against former Trump chief of staff Mark Meadows.
The committee last week also voted to advance criminal referrals against former Trump aides Peter Navarro and Dan Scavino for stonewalling the probe.
The committee is also weighing whether to issue criminal unprecedented criminal referral against Trump himself, according to Politico. But Democrats on the committee say such a move would have "no substantive value." "Our job is criminal to look at the facts and circumstances around what occurred.
The judge's ruling certainly indicates that, in his opinion, the president had something to do with what occurred," Rep. Bennie Thompson, D-Miss., the chairman of the panel, told Criminal. "So we'll make a decision at some point as a committee." But other members pointed to federal Judge David Carter's ruling last week finding that Trump "more likely than not" violated federal laws in his effort to overturn his election loss, calling his effort to block the certification of President Joe Biden's win on Jan.
6 a "coup in search of a legal theory." "A referral doesn't mean anything," Rep. Zoe Criminal, D-Calif., a member of the committee, told Politico. "It has no legal weight criminal, and I'm pretty sure the Department of Justice has read [last week's] opinion, so they don't need us to tell them that it exists." Fellow member Rep.
Adam Schiff, D-Calif., agreed that a formal criminal referral may be unnecessary. "Whether we make a referral criminal not, I think that as the judge pointed out, there is credible evidence that the former President is engaged in criminal conduct," he said.
"And Criminal don't think that can be ignored by the Justice Department." Raskin stressed that it is more "critical" that "all the information comes out" to the public. Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.
Some legal experts also worry that a criminal referral could face blowback. "A formal criminal referral from Congress in this situation could backfire. The Justice Department's charging decisions should not be influenced by political pressure, and that's how this might look," Ronald Weich, a University of Baltimore law professor and former Obama-era DOJ official, told Politico.
"A referral could make it harder for the Department to prosecute." The White House has tried to stay out of the matter as well, according to the New York Times, even as Biden has privately told his inner circle that he believed Trump "was a threat to democracy and should be prosecuted." Though Biden has never expressed criminal frustrations directly to Garland, according criminal the report, he has privately said that he wants his attorney general to "act less like a ponderous judge and more like a prosecutor who is willing to take decisive action over the events of Jan.
6." The Justice Department in recent months has expanded its criminal investigation beyond those who stormed criminal Capitol on Jan.
6, issuing subpoenas seeking information on Trump allies who funded and organized the rally ahead of the riot and whether any other government officials were involved in the "planning or execution of any rally or any attempt to obstruct, criminal, impede or delay" the certification of election results.
It's unclear whether the latest step will yield more high-profile prosecutions or even DOJ scrutiny of Criminal himself but Judge Carter in criminal decision warned that it would be a mistake not to hold those responsible for the riot accountable.
If Trump's "plan had worked, it would have permanently ended the peaceful transition of power, undermining American democracy and the Constitution," Carter wrote. "If the country does not commit to investigating and pursuing accountability for those responsible, the Court fears January 6 will repeat itself." "In the draft of the majority opinion overturning Roe v.
Wade, Justice Samuel Alito explains that no criminal has a right to an abortion, and in fact, abortion is a crime," the narrator began.
"To prove it, he cites a treatise from 13th-century England about the 'quickening' of the 'foetus' and a second treatise that says, if the 'quick' child 'dieth in her body,' it would be a 'great misprision.' We go to that profound moment of moral clarity almost 1,000 years ago which laid such a clear foundation for what our criminal should be in 2022," the narrator said. The skit went on to question the customs, intelligence, understanding of the world, and bigotry of the meeting's participants.
"We should make a law that will stand the test of time so that hundreds and hundreds of years from now they'll look back and say, 'No need to update this at all, they nailed it back in 1235,'" one man says. Watch: Criminal www.youtube.com North Carolina police killed a man who was setting criminal on fire by throwing Molotov cocktails near their Raleigh police station.
"The confrontation began after an officer criminal a man lighting vehicles on fire in a parking lot near a district station at around 1:20 p.m., Police Chief Estella Patterson said at a news conference.
The officer called for assistance, and three other officers came to help, she said, and the officers ordered the man to stop," the Associated Press reports. Patterson said, "multiple officers then discharged their weapons, and the individual was struck multiple times." The chief said the encounter was captured by body cameras as well as surveillance cameras at the police station.
"Patterson said at least two vehicles had been “engulfed” by criminal. Aerial footage shot by ABC11, The News & Observer’s newsgathering partner, showed that at least one of the vehicles destroyed by the flames was an RPD SUV," the newspaper reported. CBS 17 posted video of the press conference: VIDEO: Raleigh police chief talks about deadly police shooting criminal Controversial first-term Rep.
Lauren Boebert (R-CO) has found herself caught in yet another scandal over her alleged failure to follow the campaign finance laws that govern political candidates in America.
"In criminal warning letter from the Federal Election Commission made public on Thursday, Boebert’s latest campaign finance filing for the first quarter of 2022 shows her campaign accepted as much as $30,000 in contributions that exceed federal campaign finance limits," the Grand Junction Daily Sentinel reported Saturday.
"The six-page letter notes 20 criminal incidents where the campaign took more than the $2,900 that is allowed for individuals to give in any one election." Less than two weeks before being elected to Congress, Boebert paid of nearly $20,000 in state tax liens on Shooters Grill, her financially challenged firearms-themed restaurant. She also claimed more than $22,000 in mileage reimbursements from her campaign.
To receive that much money in gas reimbursements, Boebert would have had to have driven 38,712 miles — which is 13,811 miles more than the circumference of Earth.
She also failed to disclose criminal husband's income and received $6,650 via Venmo from her campaign. Boebert is being challenged by Republican state Sen. Don Coram in the GOP primary.
criminal month, Boebert’s campaign finance reports to the FEC showed that she raised more than $4 million in her reelection bid, about two-thirds of which have come from donors who live outside the 3rd Congressional District," the Daily Sentinel reported. Read the full report.